Z movie


 

Zobacz też:

This article is part of
the B movie
series.
B movies (Hollywood Golden Age)
B movies (Transition in the 1950s)
B movies (The exploitation boom)
B movies (1980s to the present)
Z movie

The term Z movie (or grade-Z movie) arose in the mid-1960s as an informal description of certain unequivocally non-A films. It was soon adopted to characterize low-budget pictures with quality standards well below those of most B movies and even so-called C movies. While B movies may have mediocre scripts and actors who are relatively unknown or past their prime, they are for the most part competently lit, shot, and edited. The economizing shortcuts of films identified as C movies tend to be evident throughout; nonetheless, films to which the C label is applied are generally the products of relatively stable entities within the commercial film industry and thus still adhere to certain production norms.

In contrast, most films referred to as Z movies are made for very little money on the fringes of the organized film industry or entirely outside it. As a result, scripts are often laughably bad, continuity errors tend to arise during shooting, and nonprofessional actors are frequently cast. Many Z movies are also poorly lit and edited. The micro-budget "quickies" of 1930s fly-by-night Poverty Row production houses may be thought of as Z movies avant la lettre.[1] Latter-day Zs may not evidence the same degree of technical incompetence; in addition to bargain-basement scripts and acting, they are often characterized by violent, gory, and/or sexual content and a minimum of artistic interest, readily falling into the category of exploitation, or "grindhouse" films, and some are considered the worst films ever made.

Contents

Examples

Ed Wood's ultra-low-budget Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959) has become the most famous Z movie of all time—and not for being unexpectedly good.
Ed Wood's ultra-low-budget Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959) has become the most famous Z movie of all time—and not for being unexpectedly good.

Director Ed Wood is often described as the quintessential maker of Z movies. Yet his work reveals the ambiguity of the category. Certain very-low-budget pictures of his such as Glen or Glenda (1953) and Jail Bait (1954), though broadly and risibly incompetent, are also entertaining on their own terms and evidence an intriguing artistic vision.[2]

Three films are frequently cited as exemplifying the classic Z movie:

The latter-day Z movie is typified by such pictures as Attack of the 60 Foot Centerfold (1995) and Bikini Cavegirl (2004), both directed by Fred Olen Ray, that combine traditional genre themes with extensive nudity or softcore pornography.[4] Such pictures, often after going straight to video, are fodder for late-night airing on subscription TV services such as HBO Zone.

Etymology

The earliest usage of the term (as grade-Z movie, and without the full derogatory meaning now usually intended) so far located is in a January 1965 newspaper review by critic Kevin Thomas of The Tomb of Ligeia (1964), an American International Pictures film directed by Roger Corman.[5] The earliest clear use of Z movie so far located in its now prevalent sense is by Todd McCarthy in the introduction to the 1975 book Kings of the Bs.[6] Though Z movie is most commonly used to describe films of the overtly low-grade sort described above, some critics use the term more broadly to describe any inexpensively produced movie that defies the norms of mainstream filmmaking in some significant way.[7]

Notes

  1. ^ See, e.g., Taves (1995), p. 323.
  2. ^ See, e.g., Peary (1988).
  3. ^ For more on Wood in this industrial context, see Schaefer (1999), p. 212.
  4. ^ See, e.g., Quarles (2001), pp. 79–84.
  5. ^ Thomas (1965). See also a short story by George P. Elliott, "Into the Cone of Cold," in Elliott, An Hour of Last Things and Other Stories (New York: Harper & Row, 1968), 7–55; p. 27.
  6. ^ McCarthy and Flynn (1975), p. xii.
  7. ^ See, e.g., David James (Allegories of Cinema: American Film in the Sixties), quoted in Heffernan (2004), p. 224.

Sources