|
|
|
| Zobacz też: |
Contents |
If you want to add all the "Contemporaneous Wars" you'd have to add ALL Ongoing conflicts. Not just the ones _you_ consider "war on terror".
Maybe therefore its best to remove the "Contemporaneous Wars" list from the box. And then make a seperate box for Ongoing Conflicts - PietervHuis (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Yea it is, but so many other wars/conflicts are. The creation of a seperate box for Ongoing conflicts is a pretty good idea , it could be used on other war pages as well. I'll make it myself maybe. - PietervHuis (talk) 13:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
The article does not mention terrorists, so I see no reason for its inclusion. Unless someone can give a balanced reason for its inclusion. Chwyatt (talk) 07:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Because North Korean nuclear scientists were killed in the attack and the Sirians were also involved. Both have been placed on the U.S. list of so-called Axis of evil countries which support terrorism and those countries are according to the Americans their enemies in their so-called War on Terrorism. Also the Americans were the ones who delayed and later gave the go-ahead for the operation to the Israelis. Top Gun
I think the Sa'dah conflict conflict should be added to the campaign box. And I will do that. Read these two references http://www.globalpolitician.com/21614-yemen-arab http://www.globalpolitician.com/22563-yemen before making any changes or reverts.
Please do not add an article if there's no consensus on that article's talk page regarding it being a part of the WoT. Thanks, --TheFEARgod (Ч) 09:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
If there is no problem I would like to add the 2008 unrest in Lebanon to the box. The situation is almost exactly the same like the Hamas takeover of Gaza. We got a U.S.-backed government which also got military aid from the U.S. which is fighting against three different militant groups which are armed by Syria and Iran. The enemies of the U.S. in the WoT. I know what you are going to ask a reference which states that this is part of WoT. Whell for now we don't have one. Like we don't have one for the previous conflict in Lebanon in the palestinian camp last year and the conflict in Gaza but we still linked them with WoT.Top Gun
To quote an editor from the article It has been seen by some as an attempt by the United States to neutralize Hezbollah, after failed attempts during the 2006 Lebanon War and the 2007 Lebanon conflict, which journalist Seymour Hersh said to be the work of the U.S and Saudi Arabia, through Bandar bin Sultan. This is directly linked to those two conflicts plus the Gaza conflict.Top Gun
Bush said today "The international community will not allow the Iranian and Syrian regimes, via their proxies, to return Lebanon to foreign domination and control,". He said Washington would help Siniora by strengthening his armed forces. In other words they are again trying to save there investments in Lebanon like they did last year. Top Gun
It looks pretty sloppy to me, but I'm not sure how to correct it. -- VegitaU (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)